Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3661718F24 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:57:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14234 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2015 12:57:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 14119 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2015 12:57:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 13337 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2015 12:57:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:57:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: message received from 54.164.171.186 which is an MX secondary for users@activemq.apache.org) Received: from [54.164.171.186] (HELO mx1-us-east.apache.org) (54.164.171.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:57:40 +0000 Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com (mail-ig0-f180.google.com [209.85.213.180]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 2E3AC43DE2 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbhj9 with SMTP id hj9so22641299igb.1 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 05:56:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=bfAxegPajh32hwWUfTdwxmnHB8OY2ukfFmG8BUXLsfc=; b=bWcdP/hWJydmkZJKpodGD3wAUfLgAb+vPxUJv6S4wiBACMx4OkgfR0FvLIJx2GsMOD F74hUupm9GOqf2yUw4rVyXzFpjHCIiWiYJjJEHl5cgLVOJeteM5MhHGE62J4rLqIHTpQ 5/RIagbnbIJzp/BelrmgrBR5JetNMBRtliaHjbUHQ2pX8Pj4WESceeUnIPx8iJkkaw+Q lk9n0FbWtGaqLbnYejdV92vxWhDZElJL4XPxHmNWvdxHhcACIJuiwb79qeI/RKQX39If eevmrwk8JVzRZqYr85L/vwLMHnUzIdw340bA/Epj3AP594DAuSmJ8mmvubQQbsYz2NFI YGzw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.161.196 with SMTP id mh4mr3525707icc.14.1429793787873; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 05:56:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tbain98@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.131.233 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 05:56:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.131.233 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 05:56:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:56:27 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: B1_qDJShetazgD9xkVO_JkGB_JY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Clients connected vs number of consumers From: Tim Bain To: ActiveMQ Users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c298fcd40fcd051463ce60 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c298fcd40fcd051463ce60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Where/how are you seeing zero consumers? Is this via JMX? One consumer can't consume from more than one queue, so I'd expect JMX to show one (different) consumer for each queue. On Apr 7, 2015 9:33 AM, "ALi" wrote: > Hello > We have a server that has four queues and there is only one client > connected. However every queue says that there are Cero consumers for each > queue. What does this mean?? Can someone explain this? > > Perhaps the client is not listening to any queue? > > Or that client can receive from any queue and there are no active clients? > > Thanks!! > --001a11c298fcd40fcd051463ce60--