Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7BCE178DE for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 07:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22102 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2015 07:40:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 22059 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2015 07:40:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 22041 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2015 07:40:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 07:40:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,SPF_SOFTFAIL,URI_HEX,URI_TRY_3LD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of samdowning2013@gmail.com does not designate 162.253.133.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [162.253.133.43] (HELO mwork.nabble.com) (162.253.133.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 07:40:17 +0000 Received: from mjoe.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.57]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65D81A3FEFB for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 00:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 00:27:11 -0700 (PDT) From: samdowning To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1428564431850-4694595.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1428488209797-4694494.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Throughput drop with NIO transport as compared to TCP transport MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for taking interest in this Kevin. As I already mentioned, I did those tests with 1 consumer, 1 producer and 1 consumer, 20 producers. How many consumers and producers do you suggest I repeat the tests with? Thanks, Sam -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Throughput-drop-with-NIO-transport-as-compared-to-TCP-transport-tp4694494p4694595.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.