Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tbain98@gmail.com designates
 209.85.223.179 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: tbain98@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAAZU44kFb_QSDam+z70n1UoDYcHpLk197g=D=HFR7+0+xv1grw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAAZU44kSGBevjgC0P_hAMw6--=qwC9jAcFzDk861-dDusifb4g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPVVMa-vOdOo9EOsMO-vn_yYZEQbkvMvopC1wjcivviZPP+wNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAZU44mzXkvKcMJX_z=k1DpCsbQf6uxkgHmiGtxaFHzcYfANyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAZU44kFb_QSDam+z70n1UoDYcHpLk197g=D=HFR7+0+xv1grw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bain <tbain@alumni.duke.edu>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 16:05:43 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAPVVMa8ajfs6Kh+RU6mxPZ=QY1Dm9y8kKWwozLGi-P+3K2KqpA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Simple JMX metric for the number of slow consumers?
To: ActiveMQ Users <users@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b41444c5bdc5605104225d6

--047d7b41444c5bdc5605104225d6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Are you talking about message expiration?  Or do you have another
definition for message eviction that I'm not thinking of?

On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Kevin Burton <burton@spinn3r.com> wrote:

> Does the same apply to evictions?
>
> If I have messages begin evicted by ActiveMQ I definitely want to know it=
!
> :)
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Kevin Burton <burton@spinn3r.com> wrote:
>
> > Cool!
> >
> > I think broker level at a minimum but I imagine having both on the
> > destination level would be good too.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5624
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Tim Bain <tbain@alumni.duke.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> This sounds like a useful feature; submit an Enhancement in JIRA for
> it...
> >>
> >> Were you looking for a broker-level count (count of slow consumers on
> all
> >> destinations) or a destination-level count?  Or both?  (Implementing
> both
> >> seems most useful to me, and not particularly hard to do.)
> >>
> >> Tim
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Kevin Burton <burton@spinn3r.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > According to this:
> >> >
> >> > http://activemq.apache.org/jmx.html
> >> >
> >> > There are no simple metrics for the number of slow consumers.
> >> >
> >> > Is there an easy way to figure this out?
> >> >
> >> > Would be nice for monitoring systems so that alerts can be triggered=
.
> >> >
> >> > Right now you have to enumerate each subscriber but it takes 200ms f=
or
> >> each
> >> > one so it could take a rather long time.
> >> >
> >> > Plus, it=E2=80=99s better to have something O(1) for monitoring syst=
ems vs
> >> > something O(N) which might take a rather long time.
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
> >> > Location: *San Francisco, CA*
> >> > blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
> >> > =E2=80=A6 or check out my Google+ profile
> >> > <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
> >> > <http://spinn3r.com>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
> > Location: *San Francisco, CA*
> > blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
> > =E2=80=A6 or check out my Google+ profile
> > <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
> > <http://spinn3r.com>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
> Location: *San Francisco, CA*
> blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
> =E2=80=A6 or check out my Google+ profile
> <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
> <http://spinn3r.com>
>

--047d7b41444c5bdc5605104225d6--