activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com>
Subject Re: Lots of small ActiveMQ instances or one big one?
Date Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:05:30 GMT
Does ActiveMQ do an fsync per message?

Why not do smart batching:

http://mechanical-sympathy.blogspot.com/2011/10/smart-batching.html

This way the messages could be elided, and one fsync called on all of them.

Maybe it already does, but the comment that each messages requires a sync
seems to hint that this could be more efficient.

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:46 PM, artnaseef <art@artnaseef.com> wrote:

> I think they are in-line.  More producers generally mean more concurrent
> work
> for the broker, as a single producer sends all of its messages serially to
> the broker.  Similar logic applies to consumers.
>
> More destinations generally forces more producers and consumers, although
> it
> doesn't have to.
>
> Is there something more specific that doesn't seem to match?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Lots-of-small-ActiveMQ-instances-or-one-big-one-tp4693133p4693203.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 

Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
Location: *San Francisco, CA*
blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
… or check out my Google+ profile
<https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
<http://spinn3r.com>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message