activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com>
Subject Lots of small ActiveMQ instances or one big one?
Date Fri, 13 Mar 2015 03:00:10 GMT
I’m trying to improve our ActiveMQ message throughput and I’m not really
seeing the performance I would expect.

We moved from non-persistent to persistent (which would be more ideal) and
the performance is about 4-5x slower than before.

I think this would be somewhat reasonable but our disks aren’t really at
100% utilization and they’re on SSD.  They’re only at about 5% utilization.

So perhaps instead of ONE ActiveMQ node on a 16 core box it might be more
beneficial to use say 4 or 8 ? (maybe putting them in containers).

Granted this would require a TON of work right now, but that might be the
best way to go (in theory).

Kevin

-- 

Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
Location: *San Francisco, CA*
blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
… or check out my Google+ profile
<https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
<http://spinn3r.com>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message