Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7244617FF5 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 22:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53087 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2015 22:54:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 53037 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2015 22:54:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 53025 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2015 22:54:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 22:54:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_REMOTE_IMAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of burtonator2011@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.181] (HELO mail-ob0-f181.google.com) (209.85.214.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 22:53:39 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id vb8so15921817obc.12 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:53:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=5ehdAtsSrKASwDGyaoxw2NUfMqIKkte4WVfPpeVBnsc=; b=F6hslKUw2mlzA/XeY5iDtTsCbGG65uJ2+ztoyK+wLSRX3hDDgHJuEoEcOBkWHXorOQ 9QBeqHcVCW5lPzr7Xb4VSYZQDu3RkDycI9jlNBnw2EmPgvJNQibuMdMj3XT0K6FoueTK 9jkvdpuUgikKTrV5iUyBf+TREt3rA+T87kRuDwvLlA4r0zcQWy5lWLhGBrCHqasNiGYM y+kH6N5kgGQMwLGsfY6MFryrCKVSJln7BDZLS2upzxhftyT7XicZA/R4A9i6QG+nGzAc 9dKuFH5L088YfR2L09/SCu+CJQmgS/xu03zGo2wattKWoCdBmxsPDPi1ffXm8KPCyHh6 lJBQ== X-Received: by 10.202.97.130 with SMTP id v124mr12880916oib.34.1422917617670; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:53:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: burtonator2011@gmail.com Received: by 10.183.6.234 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 14:53:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54CFFC0F.5000901@gmail.com> References: <54CFFC0F.5000901@gmail.com> From: Kevin Burton Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 14:53:17 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: xhz7JQAzwg-nhW2FeJy-hTaQdns Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Sending_directly_to_a_queue_doesn=E2=80=99t_raise_Acti?= =?UTF-8?Q?veMQ=2EAdvisory=2EProducer=2EQueue=2E=3E?= To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d5966256194050e22d357 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a113d5966256194050e22d357 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > This is by design as the second case creates an anonymous producer that > can send to any destination that it has permission to write to. Sending > that advisory every time an anonymous producer sent a message to a given > destination would create a flood of advisories which would not really be = of > help. Why is that? I mean I can create the flood of advisories now anyway. I just have to manually create a non-anonymous producer and it would then send the same number of advisories. Now it=E2=80=99s just slower and you=E2=80=99ve put a burden on me to maint= ain an LRU cache and expiry so that I can have reasonable performance :-( --=20 Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: *San Francisco, CA* blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com =E2=80=A6 or check out my Google+ profile --001a113d5966256194050e22d357--