activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com>
Subject Re: Any issues with creating lots of short lived queues?
Date Mon, 02 Feb 2015 19:02:54 GMT
Yeah. I agree but it’s complicated :-P …there are a lot of requirements and
it would take 2-10 pages to write them up I think.

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Tim Bain <tbain@alumni.duke.edu> wrote:

> The only problem with asking the small questions instead of laying out the
> architectural issue is that this feels like an XY Problem (
> http://xyproblem.info/), so us answering the Ys may miss the chance to
> find
> a better solution to the X.
> On Feb 1, 2015 9:44 PM, "artnaseef" <art@artnaseef.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes.  Destination creation and removal has high overhead.  A few million
> > times per hour - that's insane.
> >
> > Maybe the problem would be better served by an XMPP messaging model
> > (point-to-point or broadcast to a room of subscribers).  Or maybe zeromq.
> >
> > Destinations are the core of ActiveMQ's activities, and as per the JMS
> > spec,
> > there are guarantees there related to them.  The brokers organize a lot
> of
> > structure around destinations.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Any-issues-with-creating-lots-of-short-lived-queues-tp4690781p4690800.html
> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>



-- 

Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
Location: *San Francisco, CA*
blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
… or check out my Google+ profile
<https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
<http://spinn3r.com>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message