activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com>
Subject Re: Sending directly to a queue doesn’t raise ActiveMQ.Advisory.Producer.Queue.>
Date Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:04:57 GMT
Yup.. Thanks Rob. I’ll do this today.

Kevin

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com> wrote:

> Good point - I think it's a bug - you can always turn advisories off if
> you don't want a flood of them. Can you raise an issue so it doesn't get
> forgotten?
>
>
>
> On 2 Feb 2015, at 17:53, Kevin Burton <burton@spinn3r.com> wrote:
>
> >> This is by design as the second case creates an anonymous producer that
> >> can send to any destination that it has permission to write to.  Sending
> >> that advisory every time an anonymous producer sent a message to a given
> >> destination would create a flood of advisories which would not really
> be of
> >> help.
> >
> >
> > Why is that?
> >
> > I mean I can create the flood of advisories now anyway. I just have to
> > manually create a non-anonymous producer and it would then send the same
> > number of advisories.
> >
> > Now it’s just slower and you’ve put a burden on me to maintain an LRU
> cache
> > and expiry so that I can have reasonable performance :-(
> >
> > --
> >
> > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
> > Location: *San Francisco, CA*
> > blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
> > … or check out my Google+ profile
> > <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
> > <http://spinn3r.com>
>



-- 

Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
Location: *San Francisco, CA*
blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
… or check out my Google+ profile
<https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
<http://spinn3r.com>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message