Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C19E91044F for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 00:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50460 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2015 00:03:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 50418 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2015 00:03:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 49716 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2015 00:03:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:03:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=URI_HEX,URI_TRY_3LD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [162.253.133.43] (HELO mwork.nabble.com) (162.253.133.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:03:02 +0000 Received: from mjoe.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.57]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD71FFD66C5 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 16:02:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 16:00:52 -0800 (PST) From: artnaseef To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1420675252410-4689628.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1420675171831-4689627.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1420561929642.85ab79c7@Nodemailer> <1420675171831-4689627.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Is JDBC still used? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Oh, and JDBC has been known to have issues - especially having poor performance. There is no optimization in its interactions with the DB at all (e.g. no indices). -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-JDBC-still-used-tp4689546p4689628.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.