activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com>
Subject Re: GC of inactive destinations requires no consumers?
Date Thu, 29 Jan 2015 22:40:22 GMT
Thanks! That helps a lot.  It’s nice to know my hypothesis is correct :)
 Science!

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thats correct
>
>
>
> > On 29 Jan 2015, at 21:42, Kevin Burton <burton@spinn3r.com> wrote:
> >
> > It seems the inactive destination code requires both an empty queue and
> > *no* consumers on the queue?
> >
> > so if you have an empty queue, and at least 1 consumer listening to it,
> it
> > will not be GCd.. is this correct?
> >
> > --
> >
> > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
> > Location: *San Francisco, CA*
> > blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
> > … or check out my Google+ profile
> > <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
> > <http://spinn3r.com>
>



-- 

Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
Location: *San Francisco, CA*
blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
… or check out my Google+ profile
<https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
<http://spinn3r.com>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message