activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From xabhi <xabh...@gmail.com>
Subject Should I still use idleTimeout=0 which ActiveMQ 5.10.0 after the bug fix in ActiveMQ 5.8.0
Date Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:04:34 GMT
There was this bug in ActiveMQ v 5.8.0 (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4366
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4366>  ) which was worked around
by setting idleTimeout to 0 in connection factory. I have upgraded my setup
to ActiveMQ 5.10.0.

I am wondering whether to keep this setting or remove it to go back to
defaults. What could be the side-effects of setting it to 0? What will be
the benefits of reverting back to default 30s?

Thanks,
Abhi



--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Should-I-still-use-idleTimeout-0-which-ActiveMQ-5-10-0-after-the-bug-fix-in-ActiveMQ-5-8-0-tp4689846.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message