Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of
 hiremath47@gmail.com does not designate 162.253.133.43 as permitted sender)
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:20:52 -0800 (PST)
From: Sid <hiremath47@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Message-ID: <1418962852549-4689112.post@n4.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPVVMa9pE6z3gwoMK=8Jzftq_4a2q8hmKv+d_yktB6n=r47AVA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1418894085959-4689070.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <CAPVVMa9pE6z3gwoMK=8Jzftq_4a2q8hmKv+d_yktB6n=r47AVA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fixing following issue:- WARN | Transport Connection to:
 blockingQueue_1942843618 failed:
 org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive
 for too (>30000) long
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

First of all thanks for responding to this thread.

Right, I did go through following post:-
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/when-should-you-set-maxInactivityDuration-0-td4688281.html

But was wondering whether the setting of flag "keepAlive=true" helps in this
case, where wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=0.

I have failover broker url being configured on producer/consumer(broker
clients), hence say I get " WARN | Transport Connection to:
blockingQueue_1942843618 failed:
org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive
for too (>30000) long" error on broker then what steps I need to take,
because earlier I experienced that after facing above issue, the
connectivity is lost among producer, consumer and broker. 

So what's recommended next step. 

Thanks,
Sid


--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Version5-10-0-Fixing-following-issue-WARN-Transport-Connection-to-blockingQueue-1942843618-failed-org-tp4689070p4689112.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.