activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com>
Subject Re: [Kahadb vs Leveldb vs Replciated Leveldb] Performance Results
Date Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:04:10 GMT
god. the performance of replicated levelDB seems horrible here.

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:19 PM, khandelwalanuj <khandelwal.anuj90@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> I have done performance testing for kahadb, leveldb and replication
> leveldb.
> Details:
>
> *Scenario: *
> > ActiveMQ : 5.10
> > Machine : Unix
> > I tested performance by sending messages to the broker continuously with
> > any sleep or wait on producer side and measure the throughput by messages
> > sent per seconds. The throughput increase initially but after some some
> it
> > becomes constant. Similarly consumer is also running and consuming the
> > messages. I also measure messages received per seconds. I can see that
> > after some time producer and consumer throughput becomes equal.  And that
> > is what I consider as throughput.
> > I run each test mentioned below for ~2 hours.
> > I did all tests by sending persistence messages.
>
> *Results:
> *
>
> *LevelDB:
> *
> 1 producer 1 consumer: 0.48K/sec(Queue) || 0.64K/sec (Topic)
> 2 producer 1 consumer: 0.88K/sec(Queue) || 0.79K/sec (Topic)
> 1 producer 2 consumer: 0.48K/sec(Queue) || 0.64K/sec (Topic)
>
> *kahaDB:
> *
> 1 producer 1 consumer: 0.58K/sec(Queue) || 0.6K/sec (Topic)
> 2 producer 1 consumer: 0.6K/sec(Queue) || 0.6K/sec (Topic)
>
> *Replicated Leveldb:
> *
> 1 producer 1 consumer: 0.06K/sec(Queue) || 0.06K/sec (Topic)
> 2 producer 1 consumer: 0.07K/sec(Queue) || 0.06K/sec (Topic)
> 1 producer 2 consumer: 0.06K/sec(Queue) || 0.05K/sec (Topic)
>
>
> Questions:
>
> > Performance is same with kahadb and leveldb which is strange. Why kahadb
> > performance is now higher? Any particular configuration I need to tuneup
> ?
> > Does kahadb provides better performance with multiple producers and
> single
> > consumers ?(multiple writes)
> > Replicated leveldb performance is too low. Almost 10 times going down. Is
> > this expected ? Or I should tune some configurations to get better
> > performance?
>
> Also If there is any testing done by ActiveMQ developers, please point me
> to
> that.
>
> Thanks,
> Anuj
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Kahadb-vs-Leveldb-vs-Replciated-Leveldb-Performance-Results-tp4688306.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


-- 

Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
Location: *San Francisco, CA*
blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
… or check out my Google+ profile
<https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
<http://spinn3r.com>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message