Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tbain98@gmail.com designates
 209.85.192.42 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: tbain98@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <1416344288970-4687673.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1416250806575-4687564.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <1416344288970-4687673.post@n4.nabble.com>
From: Tim Bain <tbain@alumni.duke.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:02:04 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAPVVMa9et3oiLRcXsw6YwNpM49yXUaPdjCBye_i63EaUVMYNPg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Message Selector or Composite Destinations
To: ActiveMQ Users <users@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf0cb469c06ff05082a16cc

--047d7bf0cb469c06ff05082a16cc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

It sounds like it could be a bug, though it might not be.  Assuming you can
reproduce this in a test environment, you should try attaching a debugger
to the broker, setting breakpoints, and stepping through the relevant
code.  AbstractSubscription.matches() and Queue.doAcutalDispatch() seem
like good places to start with your breakpoints, though I haven't stepped
through this particular code before so I'm just guessing.

Also, does this happen when there are only a few messages in the queue?  Or
does it only happen when there are lots of Version 2 messages mixed in with
the Version 1 messages?  And does it fix itself when the Version2 consumer
comes back online, or are there still unprocessed messages when both
consumers are online?  I've got a vague memory that in earlier versions of
ActiveMQ, there was a limit to how many messages could be in the cursor to
be dispatched at any one time and that messages not in the cursor weren't
considered for dispatching (so only the first N messages in the queue could
be processed, and if all of them were Version 2 messages, they could block
any Version 1 messages from being blocked until the Version 1 consumer came
online and cleared some of them out).  I may be misremembering, and if not
there may have been changes in the behavior since those discussions, but if
this is still how the broker works, then it could explain messages being
blocked while the Version 2 consumer is offline but getting processed once
all consumers are back online.

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:58 PM, juanmanuel.romeraferrio <
juanmanuel.romeraferrio@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm using version 5.10.0
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Selector-or-Composite-Destinations-tp4687564p4687673.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

--047d7bf0cb469c06ff05082a16cc--