activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anand R <workana...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Database Locker Vs. Lease Database Locker
Date Thu, 06 Nov 2014 19:47:21 GMT
Can one of the experts or someone with JDBC Master/Slave deployment
experience comment on this please? The documentation is ambiguous.
Thanks,
Anand

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Anand R <workanandr@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi -
>     I would like to know what type of Locker is recommended when using
> jdbc persistence. I see that the configuration for mySQL in
> http://activemq.apache.org/jdbc-support.html does not mention anything
> about the type of locker.
>
> In http://activemq.apache.org/pluggable-storage-lockers.html, though the
> Lease based locker is recommended over the Database Locker, the Lease-based
> one is NOT mentioned as the default.
> I followed the configuration in
> http://activemq.apache.org/jdbc-support.html, which I believe is using
> the default Database locker. Are the problems mentioned with default locker
> still valid? Should I consider moving to Lease-based? If so, why? and if
> not, why not?
>
> Appreciate the help.
>
> Thanks,
> Anand
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message