activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 5.9 to 5.10 Upgrade
Date Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:07:53 GMT
We have a hub/spoke architecture. We did a rolling upgrade from 5.7.0 to
5.10.0 starting with the hub instance. So long as the client/server & peer
protocols don't become incompatible it's fine.

On 15 October 2014 21:39, djdick <djdick@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:

> We're looking to upgrade from 5.9 to 5.10 and are using a network of
> brokers
> topology. In order to keep downtime to a minimum we're looking at upgrading
> one server at a time while keeping the other servers active. For example
> server A stays active while we shutdown server B and upgrade from 5.9 to
> 5.10. Then bring server B up while we take down server A and upgrade it to
> 5.10.
>
> Has anyone else tried this?
> Will this allow us to upgrade our environment without any downtime?
> Has anyone experienced problems with 2 different versions of ActiveMQ
> communicating with each other (5.9 to 5.10)?
>
> Any guidance or experience you could share with this process is greatly
> appreciated.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/5-9-to-5-10-Upgrade-tp4686426.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message