Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A695B110E2 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 19:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57131 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2014 19:14:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 57087 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2014 19:14:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 57076 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2014 19:14:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 19:14:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of rahul86.08@gmail.com does not designate 162.253.133.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [162.253.133.43] (HELO mwork.nabble.com) (162.253.133.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 19:14:03 +0000 Received: from mjoe.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.57]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A7A5020A9 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 12:07:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 12:14:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Rahul Bhardwaj To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1410030841851-4685345.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1409833083494-4685282.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: v5.8 Master-Slave shared NFSv4 filesystem setup - having problem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I actually moved to sharedDb approach and able to setup it up & test successfully. I will test the sharedfile approach may be sometime later to compare the performance from both approaches. Rodrego - Thanks for your input. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/v5-8-Master-Slave-shared-NFSv4-filesystem-setup-having-problem-tp4685282p4685345.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.