activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Black <be_st...@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: Consumer performance problem with Tx
Date Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:54:55 GMT
Hi Matt,

thanks for the response.

The reason that we have not migrated to a later version of ActiveMq is that
we are looking to move away from using ActiveMq due to the problems we have
had.  Therefore, we wanted to avoid going through the whole testing process
for a later version of ActiveMq.  We use shared nothing master/slave
replicated which has been removed in later ActiveMq versions.

We are doing JMS local (originally we tried XA but had massive problems with
that) and we have tested with all caching settings for the DMLC to no avail. 
Our connection is not provided from a pool but directly from standard
ActiveMq connection factory (org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory),
due to the fact that it is cached in the DMLC.

Thanks,

Justin



--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Consumer-performance-problem-with-Tx-tp4685226p4685279.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message