activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From artnaseef <...@artnaseef.com>
Subject Re: JMS to JMS Bridge Connection
Date Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:00:30 GMT
Hmm, the inactivity timer is closing the connection:

2014-07-25 17:37:52,373 | DEBUG | Transport Connection to: tcp://[IP
ADDRESS]:4507 failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException:
Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: tcp://[IP ADDRESS]:4507 |
org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | ActiveMQ
InactivityMonitor Worker
org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive
for too (>30000) long: tcp://v:4507
 at
org.apache.activemq.transport.AbstractInactivityMonitor$4.run(AbstractInactivityMonitor.java:215)
 at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:895)
 at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:918)
 at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
2014-07-25 17:37:52,374 | DEBUG | Unregistering MBean
org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=serverABroker,connector=clientConnectors,connectorName=[Connector
Name],connectionViewType=clientId,connectionName=queue_1_inbound |
org.apache.activemq.broker.jmx.ManagementContext | ActiveMQ
InactivityMonitor Worker


Let me ask straight-out - does this cause a a problem for the application? 
Or, are these log messages and brief interruptions to flow the only real
concern?  I'm trying to make sure I'm trying to solve the right problem.




--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-Connection-tp4684129p4684140.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message