activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From asookazian <asookaz...@gmail.com>
Subject evaluating clustering options for AMQ 5.9.1
Date Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:33:21 GMT
Hi I am doing some R&D regarding clustering for AMQ 5.9.1.  We are looking to
evaluate active/active options as well as active/passive options. 
Master/slave pattern seems to be popular for failover.  

I've looked at the following blogs:

http://bsnyderblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-to-use-automatic-failover-in.html
<http://bsnyderblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-to-use-automatic-failover-in.html>  

http://sensatic.net/activemq/new-activemq-failover-and-clustering-goodies.html
<http://sensatic.net/activemq/new-activemq-failover-and-clustering-goodies.html>  

http://tmielke.blogspot.com/2011/09/activemq-network-bridge-to-masterslave.html
<http://tmielke.blogspot.com/2011/09/activemq-network-bridge-to-masterslave.html>  

Please advise what would be the best choice for us considering active/active
scenario.  Network of brokers?  If so, what is the best example/tutorial
that I can deploy to a dev lab with VMs?  thx.





--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/evaluating-clustering-options-for-AMQ-5-9-1-tp4683683.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message