Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DC7D1164D for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 11:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3873 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2014 11:24:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 3832 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2014 11:24:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 3824 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2014 11:24:03 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 May 2014 11:24:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [82.146.101.77] (HELO smtp.fks.be) (82.146.101.77) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 May 2014 11:24:00 +0000 Received: from rio.fks.be ([10.0.0.151] helo=fks.be) by smtp.fks.be with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WjRqO-0000lM-E2; Sun, 11 May 2014 13:23:00 +0200 Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 13:23:00 +0200 From: Frank Gevaerts To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: ActiveMQ on unreliable mesh networks? Message-ID: <20140511112259.GA10981@fks.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, I need to build a system with a number of hosts connected through an unreliable mesh network where the hosts are physically moving, i.e. all connections are expected to drop regularly, and hosts that used to be one hop apart might suddenly be three hops apart or not connected at all. The network might occasionally be split in such a way that two sets of hosts never see each other directly, but one (or more) hosts are more mobile and move between sets, and could therefore store and forward messages. All hosts need to (eventually) get data from all other hosts, and can't lose data. Can activemq handle such a setup? Frank -- Frank Gevaerts frank.gevaerts@fks.be fks bvba - Formal and Knowledge Systems http://www.fks.be/