Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of
 jg.guerra@gmail.com does not designate 216.139.250.139 as permitted sender)
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: guerra <jg.guerra@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Message-ID: <1398872803243-4680760.post@n4.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <5360F0F4.5000900@gmail.com>
References: <1398860427574-4680744.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <5360F0F4.5000900@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 5.9.1 +MQTT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Okay, thanks for your reply.

Yes, you are right but I was looking at this link 

https://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/ism/v1r0m0/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.ism.doc%2FDeveloping%2Fdevmqttapp.html
<https://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/ism/v1r0m0/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.ism.doc%2FDeveloping%2Fdevmqttapp.html>  

and I am not fully sure whether ActiveMQ supports the settings this link
suggest in order to get a HA connection. I agree with you that it's a client
stuff the failover thing but, do you think it is enough before jumping in
into this?. 

The bottom line is that we have already a HA infrastructure based on
ActiveMQ and we'd like to take advantage of it with new devices based on
MQTT. I hope the ActiveMQ folks will actively poke the integration/support
of this protocol into the broker.

Thank you 


--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-9-1-MQTT-tp4680744p4680760.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.