Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A7D611023 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95405 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2014 18:07:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 95106 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2014 18:06:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 94855 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2014 18:06:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:06:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [216.139.250.139] (HELO joe.nabble.com) (216.139.250.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:04:31 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.139] (helo=joe.nabble.com) by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Wd1WJ-0001X9-6v for users@activemq.apache.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:03:43 -0700 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:03:28 -0700 (PDT) From: artnaseef To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1398276208193-4680480.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1398270887931-4680477.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1397118157913-4680200.post@n4.nabble.com> <1397186801327-4680213.post@n4.nabble.com> <1397319437041-4680251.post@n4.nabble.com> <1397363935781-4680253.post@n4.nabble.com> <1397412137871-4680260.post@n4.nabble.com> <1397468298011-4680272.post@n4.nabble.com> <1397755195944-4680394.post@n4.nabble.com> <1398270887931-4680477.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Can a producer and consumer running on different activemq versions exchange messages? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ah, mixing 4.x and 5.x might be bad - I've never looked into that. Perhaps bridging between the old brokers and new would work well. http://activemq.apache.org/jms-to-jms-bridge.html The big problem is needing the two activemq client versions, which means it may be necessary to have two JVMs running with camel connecting to each-other via another technology (REST?). -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Can-a-produce-and-consumer-running-on-different-activemq-versions-exchange-messages-tp4680200p4680480.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.