Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A193F105F9 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:20:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41079 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2014 10:20:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 40630 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2014 10:20:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 40590 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2014 10:20:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:20:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,SPF_SOFTFAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of khandelwal.anuj90@gmail.com does not designate 216.139.250.139 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.250.139] (HELO joe.nabble.com) (216.139.250.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:20:31 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.139] (helo=joe.nabble.com) by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WXT83-0004c1-MU for users@activemq.apache.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 03:19:43 -0700 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 03:19:28 -0700 (PDT) From: khandelwalanuj To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1396952368609-4680153.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Slow Consumers in ActiveMQ 5.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I was going through https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4621 *(AbortSlowAckConsumerStrategy )* If I specify this strategy to abort slow consumers in my xml configuration, does it also changes the way we consider a consumer slow. Previously we consider a consumer as slow based on the pending messages and prefetch limit. Do we now consider a consumer slow based on the last ack received time ? Thanks, Anuj -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-Consumers-in-ActiveMQ-5-9-tp4680153.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.