Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E8B210666 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47019 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2014 19:56:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 46971 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2014 19:56:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 46963 invoked by uid 99); 13 Feb 2014 19:56:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:56:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:56:21 +0000 Received: from joe.nabble.com ([192.168.236.139]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WE2O6-0004w6-Dq for users@activemq.apache.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:55:58 -0800 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:55:58 -0800 (PST) From: jlindwall To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1392321358403-4677957.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: failover with a single broker? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I am looking to get automatic client connection retry for a single broker. By that I mean if the client connection to the broker fails, the client will retry that connection. It seems like the failover: protocol can give me this right? failover:(tcp://server:61616) The "normal" use case for failover seems to be to support master/slave failover in the client. Is it sensible/safe for me to use failover in the case where there is but a single broker? Thanks, john -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/failover-with-a-single-broker-tp4677957.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.