activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chirag Pujara <chiragpuj...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: performance Replicated LevelDB vs. SAN
Date Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:14:25 GMT
Hello kal,


I am also trying to setup activemq with LevelDb. But having issues and
Activemq stops processing messages on queue. I can't figure out issue. Can
you share your settings/configuration for zookeeper and activemq so that I
can figure out what is going on.

thanks,
chirag


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:32 AM, kal123 <kpfininfo01@gmail.com> wrote:

> The following links states:
> http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html
> For those willing to try out new tech, the Replicated LevelDB Store gives
> speeds similar to a SAN solution without the hassle of having to setup a
> highly available shared file system.
>
>
> During our testing with Replicated LevelDB, the hugh difference between the
> SAN and Replicated Leveldb
>
> With one queue we observed ~6000 msg/per sec with SAN, while replicated
> leveldb was about ~600 msg/per sec.
>
> Does anyone have any input on performance and if any tuning had to be done
> to achieve it?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/performance-Replicated-LevelDB-vs-SAN-tp4677811.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message