activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noel OConnor <noel.ocon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: performance Replicated LevelDB vs. SAN
Date Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:54:24 GMT
Check if you're hitting the max disk write on your local disk.

SAN disks can have battery backed caches which write to memory before
writing to disk.


On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:32 AM, kal123 <kpfininfo01@gmail.com> wrote:

> The following links states:
> http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html
> For those willing to try out new tech, the Replicated LevelDB Store gives
> speeds similar to a SAN solution without the hassle of having to setup a
> highly available shared file system.
>
>
> During our testing with Replicated LevelDB, the hugh difference between the
> SAN and Replicated Leveldb
>
> With one queue we observed ~6000 msg/per sec with SAN, while replicated
> leveldb was about ~600 msg/per sec.
>
> Does anyone have any input on performance and if any tuning had to be done
> to achieve it?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/performance-Replicated-LevelDB-vs-SAN-tp4677811.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message