activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From kal123 <kpfininf...@gmail.com>
Subject performance Replicated LevelDB vs. SAN
Date Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:32:32 GMT
The following links states:
http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html
For those willing to try out new tech, the Replicated LevelDB Store gives
speeds similar to a SAN solution without the hassle of having to setup a
highly available shared file system.


During our testing with Replicated LevelDB, the hugh difference between the
SAN and Replicated Leveldb

With one queue we observed ~6000 msg/per sec with SAN, while replicated
leveldb was about ~600 msg/per sec.

Does anyone have any input on performance and if any tuning had to be done
to achieve it?




--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/performance-Replicated-LevelDB-vs-SAN-tp4677811.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message