Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B8B610F0A for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 19:43:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10061 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2014 19:43:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 10028 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2014 19:43:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 10020 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2014 19:43:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 19:43:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 19:43:01 +0000 Received: from joe.nabble.com ([192.168.236.139]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1W0z1V-0005iz-9r for users@activemq.apache.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 11:42:41 -0800 Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:42:41 -0800 (PST) From: uromahn To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1389210161277-4676131.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1389138901985-4676092.post@n4.nabble.com> <1389203230756-4676122.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Statistics Question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org jconsole reports the exact same number, so no issue there. I re-ran my tests and checking the statistics immediately after the run was completed.The statistics make more sense now with the definition you provided. The average enqueue time is consistent with the test - aprox. 1000ms which is the time it took to send all messages before the first dequeue started. However, the naming of this property is very confusing, IMHO. For me, enqueuing is the process of putting a message into a queue and dequeuing is the process of taking it out. So, the property should actually be more "time queued" meaning the amount of time a message was sitting in a queue. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Statistics-Question-tp4676092p4676131.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.