Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCBCE1073D for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24514 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2013 16:24:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 24399 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2013 16:24:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 24391 invoked by uid 99); 5 Dec 2013 16:24:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:24:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [216.139.250.139] (HELO joe.nabble.com) (216.139.250.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:24:49 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.139] (helo=joe.nabble.com) by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Vobib-0000hJ-NK for users@activemq.apache.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 08:24:01 -0800 Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:23:46 -0800 (PST) From: edbras To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1386260626505-4675197.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1386159308070-4675087.post@n4.nabble.com> <1386163410580-4675096.post@n4.nabble.com> <1386244903428-4675181.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: When will activemq-core 5.9 be present in maven central repo? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > yah, if using the spring config, you may want activemq-spring also Yes of course, sounds kind of logic ;).. And yes, that did the trick. I now have: activemq-broker, activemq-client, activemq-spring, activemq-activemq-kahadb-store Which seems to work fine. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/When-will-activemq-core-5-9-be-present-in-maven-central-repo-tp4675087p4675197.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.