activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Performance using multikahaDB
Date Wed, 18 Dec 2013 22:30:21 GMT
the only overhead occurs when jms transactions span the stores because
a commit requires two phases. If you confine destinations that span
transactions in a single store you can avoid this.

On 9 December 2013 10:42, Sophia Wright <sophiawright43@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using multikahadb persistence adapter. I am creating separate adapter
> for some destinations ( say for 10)
> So is there any performance overhead with more number of kahadb adapters ?
>
> What should be the ideal number of persistence adapters to avoid any
> performance issue ?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Performance-using-multikahaDB-tp4675277.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com

Mime
View raw message