Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6673F10480 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 23:37:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25231 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2013 23:37:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 25160 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2013 23:37:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 25152 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2013 23:37:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 23:37:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of christian.posta@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.44] (HELO mail-la0-f44.google.com) (209.85.215.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 23:37:37 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id er20so1548307lab.31 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:37:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=qJJ6gcJYrDTaTBW1bLk62NrEBZDbMIyWifzg9tLgVBE=; b=FLvld+jhEHfrqIy41gi/0Rca4cVPzzCm1dgL5AAzJcn6T2SbL0cYYYUVznCZ6Kw74s YPtoe3tNmGdYfxTxBJe2lHbM99VPU07CS9uFrASPPu4MLUk3Jt5mpcozHx+2AyU4o2ll ibMmN+5v8E27RWS0qCD6LNNuhst+DLJe+ao2hgTw5TM8vbYJxg9qWxfCwmL1VN7kYwNR cYnnPevPVugtZchGDHScpuH48BoeqGzg4amK6lbGzq+NHoRpF7Be8Fvvea3kQsMr2qH4 VXtCz6p+G+Ft8eXuoMscBtsS7ZA4qNI1Lu8iZxyjFUVs81AjDeDbnIqRbj0Dsa8Q6eRm +vkg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.88.3 with SMTP id bc3mr6287597lab.4.1383608237104; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:37:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.243.139 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:37:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 16:37:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 5.3 question and server upgrade question... From: Christian Posta To: "users@activemq.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The clients should negotiate the correct open-wire (protocol version) so in theory the broker will be backward compatible with older clients. Just make sure the activemq-openwire-legacy jar is on the classpath (should be by default). Of course I would test this out to make sure :) On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Ned Wolpert wrote: > Folks- > > I have a 5.3 installation that we're using, and I have 2 questions for it: > > 1) We have prefetch set to 1 for all of the message consumers on one queue, > where message handling is slow. But it still seems like messages aren't > really 'round robin' to the next available message consumer. I'll see a few > consumers are free but messages are waiting around. Is there a > configuration that can help? (I should note that the server has been > running consistently for 9 months and it seems to be getting worse.... > would a restart help?) > > 2) We are looking to upgrade to 5.9. I haven't started the process of > testing, but I wanted to see if this is a case where the 5.3 clients need > to be upgraded at the same time as the server, or if the clients can be > rolled over a few weeks to 5.9 after the server gets updated? > > Thanks! > > -- > Virtually, Ned Wolpert > > "Settle thy studies, Faustus, and begin..." --Marlowe -- Christian Posta http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta