Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2086E10BCA for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26999 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2013 11:30:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 26573 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2013 11:30:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 26530 invoked by uid 99); 18 Nov 2013 11:30:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:30:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.181] (HELO mail-ie0-f181.google.com) (209.85.223.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:30:34 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id e14so1619999iej.26 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 03:30:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=uPj99AjI7dB54Ha/8vBf0XYMe5+F7hLIAhLcPxJ8XM4=; b=QZroNrLLWdHtfBIUVsyIw2uXhSbIwx3tGaaPMGM4Xm9lf/yZnxFFdxKsNoii7zzFl+ BAU7GiGM2e5GNIKRPP5Rt8yjJ4SnwI1LeCx4abpqJxIYVlMPwdP5/KTITbgev2+TiOu6 C/i1Hj/2hnE6iohRPJSTQRslxdp8L4EFXMZLFZkOOQUWg8pzQOxfxxML80atEdPqb9Dw jy50/29WB1hZVuOtWAoD/mVsD2okmo7DR7RzV4Y8APRVD71Odf1e2nw0DH++GV15qCKL l+KY2q2y/+Ua8YBj2GN2YmVQQrsZM3KYVruZu1kt+hlXAianL/QEZrLn5ryPx8VF1pgF SoFg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.117.40 with SMTP id kb8mr13346344igb.60.1384774213478; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 03:30:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.225.134 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 03:30:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1384768865547-4674604.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1384768865547-4674604.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:30:13 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ActiveMQ resource adapter doesn't return a XA connection factory From: Gary Tully To: "users@activemq.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org with the RA, the transaction management (xa enlistment) is handled by the RA connection pool. The 'api' is the JMS connection factory, not the XA connection factory b/c transaction management is the containers responsibility. The activemq ra supports XA transactions but does not expose an XA connection factory as user level xa associations would conflict with those of the ra connection pool. On 18 November 2013 10:01, fcosfc wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm using an ActiveMQ 5.7.0 JMS resource adapter on a TomEE 1.5.2 plus > application server (default configuration). TomEE documentation says that > the ra returns connection factories with XA support by default > , but I've been > debugging and it returns an ActiveMQConnectionFactory, please review my > post at TomEE user forum > > . I've tried to set the TransactionSupport setting to xa without success. > > Do you have any clue about this issue? > > Regards, > > Paco. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-resource-adapter-doesn-t-return-a-XA-connection-factory-tp4674604.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- http://redhat.com http://blog.garytully.com