Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gsim@redhat.com designates
 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <528A3AEF.7010908@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:06:07 +0000
From: Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd, Registered in England and Wales under Company
 Registration No. 3798903, Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Matt Parsons
 (USA), Charlie Peters (USA), Paul Hickey (Ireland)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Does AMQP supports ActiveMQ failover options in URL ??
References: <1384770455619-4674606.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <528A0D85.30201@redhat.com> <1384787652100-4674629.post@n4.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <1384787652100-4674629.post@n4.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 11/18/2013 03:14 PM, xbhanu wrote:
> So ActiveMQ failover://() will not work with ActiveMQ? right ? --
> failover://(amqp://host:port) will not work ? (it anyways gives me
> malformedURL exceptions)

The ActiveMQ failover transport syntax won't work with the QPid AMQP 1.0 
JMS client.

> I am using the qpid provided API (qpid-amqp-1-0-client-jms-0.22.jar).

That client does not offer any inbuilt failover/reconnection function.

> ActiveMQ does not consider the sasl_mechs or any brokerlist options?

I believe that only PLAIN (and ANONYMOUS) are supported by ActiveMQ at 
present, but perhaps someone else can confirm that?

> I
> thought maybe I could use kerberos support with aMQP in ActiveMQ, but doest
> look like I would be able to do so. Your valuable thoughts please?