Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C8EF10A67 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19202 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2013 16:24:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 18871 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2013 16:24:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 18849 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2013 16:24:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:24:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,SPF_SOFTFAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of sophiawright43@gmail.com does not designate 216.139.250.139 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.250.139] (HELO joe.nabble.com) (216.139.250.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:24:01 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.139] (helo=joe.nabble.com) by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VkywN-0007hy-Hv for users@activemq.apache.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:23:15 -0800 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:23:00 -0800 (PST) From: Sophia Wright To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1385396580534-4674823.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <52937109.2020402@gmail.com> References: <1385128499139-4674759.post@n4.nabble.com> <1385367190515-4674800.post@n4.nabble.com> <1385393661665-4674819.post@n4.nabble.com> <52937109.2020402@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Transactions in ActiveMQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for your response, Will you please let me know something about my first post regarding Client Acknowledgement Vs Transactions ? --> "I have a requirement where I am confused between transactions and Explicit acknowledgement. The requirement is: When a consumer receives a message it do some processing with the message before acknowledging the message. And while processing the message it could get some exception and consumer might crash in the middle of processing the message and when it comes up again, it should get the message. So since the message is already consumed but could not be processed completely, i want to get that message again. So here what should I use, transactions or explicit acknowledgement ? how to get this redelivery of messages ? In addition to that I also want to know behavior of transactions on both producer and consumer side. Like client acknowledgement is only for consumer. Is transactions for both? if yes, how differently it works for producer and consumer ? " -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Transactions-in-ActiveMQ-tp4674759p4674823.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.