activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: LevelDB in ActiveMQ 5.9.0
Date Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:09:04 GMT
Does level db have support for that scheduled persistent store?
http://activemq.apache.org/delay-and-schedule-message-delivery.html

Or maybe I am mistaking or remembering wrong that the scheduler has a
separate store from the regular store for its scheduled messages.



On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com> wrote:
> of the ~3k unit tests - many use the default store and we have not
> switched the default store. Until we do, and work through any issues
> we won't know for sure. We plan to do that before we make it the
> default.
> The only known caveat atm is priority support, levelDb does not
> respect JMS priority in the same way as kahaDB or JDBC does.
>
> On 22 October 2013 15:25, Paul Gale <paul.n.gale@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Per Claus Ibsen's blog post:
>>
>> "Over time level db is planned to be default out of the box persistent
>> store, instead of the current kahadb store. Though we are not there
>> yet, so kahadb is still the default store."
>>
>> What does "we are not there yet" mean? What are the caveats regarding
>> LevelDB usage?
>>
>> Copious detail is much appreciated.
>>
>> Just wondering.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Paul
>
>
>
> --
> http://redhat.com
> http://blog.garytully.com



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen

Mime
View raw message