Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of christian.posta@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.45 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1378459418047-4671250.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1377857161040-4670977.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<CAKS7T5MHVBw1=FcPtDDUNdyn2dj53Cn69_82gEAfV5eX=qxxHA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1378283116908-4671129.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<1378291779553-4671148.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<CAKS7T5P__tCMBV-7=qjRxeWTP7zF=p2GxOHKAk58muueaUYPyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1378459418047-4671250.post@n4.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 07:26:09 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAKS7T5OY7CnBmohS9Q5d_y8Pbrho8+5qdwCipLEG8zsFhHPZPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NIO transport performance for ActiveMQ
From: Christian Posta <christian.posta@gmail.com>
To: "users@activemq.apache.org" <users@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160a432ddd00f04e5b7d1a4

--089e0160a432ddd00f04e5b7d1a4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

johnbing==Anuj? same person posting all these under diff alias? funny
shit....

so like i said, post your stack trace.. and also your config (broker + JVM
args + client settings, etc), and we can help out more. NIO doesn't "reduce
threads" magically in the overall broker... it reduces the number needed to
sustain large numbers of connections. If you have other settings that
create more threads in the broker core, then it's a wash right?


On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:23 AM, johnbing <bingjohn77@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes I have also tested it with 20 producers consumers. But still not seeing
> any reduction in the number of threads. I have tested NIO with STOMP as
> well
> as JMS producers.
>
> USING(Language)          No. of threads before running producer   No. of
> threads after running producers(~20)
> STOMP (PYTHON producer)                         63
> 72
> STOMP +NIO(PYTHON producer)                     67
> 82
> TCP(JAVA producer)                                      58
> 86
> NIO(JAVA producer)                                      58
> 87
>
> Thanks,
> Anuj
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NIO-transport-performance-for-ActiveMQ-tp4670977p4671250.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta

--089e0160a432ddd00f04e5b7d1a4--