Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CED7E106B3 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70058 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2013 10:24:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 70004 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2013 10:24:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 69979 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2013 10:24:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:24:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of demablogia@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.178] (HELO mail-ie0-f178.google.com) (209.85.223.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:24:21 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id to1so6960374ieb.37 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 03:24:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wa+xsfwCV7OFUMdqyzXmi1QtH2l1boCRhIUYrUxY1w4=; b=QG2AhHOmjbMN5sZSS8sCPH8KFPcICWP9vKIgDIPIPcZVLhwvSdJhf/XDy7KKWqpaXH p/ra1xZ6BQvLoJ7uWM/zLxHM4uTmKAq+w9/xJOXGgwN6/fE8WGwtc6ZeUcQ7o07J4J2L ElMOU0HhY5PMoZ7zAI8DsUXkZ+CA1mqplM26335qW4Ykmtcs8g7VTT1zPwFc92R1EpPA peSmj1LOaWymYF1kfwCOMKZ5cT262Q5psX1vAAVKGjWJ55l1IMWMXiB2clc3QI7395Ky HwQXV1tqKRaacKvuSAiZcasQywY4OL+DaZR+lWws7g6zUDMnQDxppB/xQjlp4E3a499y tVlA== X-Received: by 10.50.22.105 with SMTP id c9mr6082475igf.36.1379327040847; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 03:24:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.22.201 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 03:23:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jose_Mar=EDa_Zaragoza?= Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:23:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Best configuration for a network of 3 brokers To: users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for you reply My choice was a full mesh : A connects to B and C; B connects to A and C , = .... One question , do I need to set networkTTL to 2 ? or every message received by A is always resent to B & C ? Thanks 2013/9/12 Torsten Mielke : > The answers really depends on your use case and how you want to leverage = the brokers. > However the most typical topologies in general are a full mesh (every bro= ker connected to all other brokers) and hub-and-spoke (one hub broker and m= ultiple store brokers that connect to the hub). > > But again the best topology depends on your use case. > > Regards, > > Torsten Mielke > tmielke@redhat.com > tmielke.blogspot.com > > > On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:05 PM, Jose Mar=EDa Zaragoza wrote: > >> Hello: >> >> I'm using ActiveMQ 5.8.0 and my client requires to install 3 brokers >> into 3 different servers >> >> What is the best configuraration ? Each ActiveMQ server connected to >> others ? A ring ? >> Is possible a loop ? >> >> Thanks > > >