activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <Bjoern.Bec...@easycash.de>
Subject AW: AW: Loadbalancer Alive-Checks
Date Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:40:10 GMT
Hi Dejan,

thanks for the link, we'll check this solution.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Björn 


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: chubrilo@gmail.com [mailto:chubrilo@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Dejan Bosanac
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. September 2013 12:40
An: users@activemq.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Loadbalancer Alive-Checks

Hi,

we have some users creating a servlet that will help with load balancing check. Check this
Jira for more info

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2829


Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/


On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> ok, the loadbalancer is a ActiveMQ broker with two network connectors, 
> or an appliance (Juniper, Cisco, F5, ...) ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 09/19/2013 12:26 PM, Bjoern.Becker@easycash.de wrote:
>
>> Hi JB,
>>
>> I'll try to. We got two activemq servers working as a cluster!
>> The producer speak with the loadbalancer in front of both servers.
>>
>>                         -> ActiveMQ A <-
>> Producer -> LB          | |             LB <- Consumer
>>                         -> ActiveMQ B <-
>>
>>
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards Björn
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:jb@nanthrax.net]
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. September 2013 12:21
>> An: users@activemq.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: Loadbalancer Alive-Checks
>>
>> Hi Bjoern
>>
>> which kind of LB did you setup ? Could you quickly describe what you did ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 09/19/2013 12:10 PM, Bjoern.Becker@easycash.de wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> we're running activemq with a loadbalancer setup. The loadbalancer 
>>> does TCP alive checks to port 61616 which causes many Warnings in 
>>> the activemq log.
>>> Is there any way to ignore requests from the loadbalancers ip? It's 
>>> important to don't denied the access for those ip addresses, we want 
>>> that they don't disturb the application.
>>>
>>> 2013-08-30 12:39:11,038 | WARN  | Transport Connection to:
>>> tcp://10.12.21.4:11583 failed: java.net.SocketException: Connection 
>>> reset | org.apache.activemq.broker.**TransportConnection.Transport | 
>>> ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///10.12.21.4:11583@61616 2013-08-30
>>> 12:39:11,429 | WARN  | Transport Connection to: 
>>> tcp://10.12.20.4:11198
>>> failed: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset | 
>>> org.apache.activemq.broker.**TransportConnection.Transport | 
>>> ActiveMQ
>>> Transport: tcp:///10.12.20.4:11198@61616
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>
>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards Björn
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Mime
View raw message