activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Posta <christian.po...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: NIO transport performance for ActiveMQ
Date Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:45:39 GMT
Maybe google will turn up something.

Your best bet is to run the benchmarks yourself on your own hardware and
profile. That will give you the best indications.


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:37 AM, johnbing <bingjohn77@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey,
> Thanks for the link. Can you please provide me any link which compare NIO
> vs TCP transport in terms of throughput and number of threads. It will be a
> big help.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:53 PM, ceposta [via ActiveMQ] <
> ml-node+s2283324n4671852h26@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
>
> > You can take a look here:
> >
> > https://github.com/chirino/jms-benchmark
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:24 AM, johnbing <[hidden email]<
> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4671852&i=0>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > I have searched but not able to find any results or any graphs for
> > ActiveMQ
> > > performance. I mean do we have any numbers for ActiveMQ performance (
> > > throughput, memory uses , threads etc.)
> > > Most of the other frameworks always share performance analysis and
> > graphs.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> >
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NIO-transport-performance-for-ActiveMQ-tp4670977p4671850.html
> >
> > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Christian Posta*
> > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > twitter: @christianposta
> >  http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> > below:
> >
> >
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NIO-transport-performance-for-ActiveMQ-tp4670977p4671852.html
> >  To unsubscribe from NIO transport performance for ActiveMQ, click here<
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4670977&code=YmluZ2pvaG43N0BnbWFpbC5jb218NDY3MDk3N3wtNTYxOTE0MzM2
> >
> > .
> > NAML<
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NIO-transport-performance-for-ActiveMQ-tp4670977p4671900.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message