activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Posta <christian.po...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Did I turn off producer flow control correctly?
Date Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:41:16 GMT
Well, not sure. I would review the test case to make sure it's set up
exactly the way you guys have it.
The goal is to get the test case to lock up somehow so that it doesn't
reach "making progress 99"

Or you could take some time-series (3-4 snapshots) of the broker's threads
(both brokers) so that we can see the progression of the threads over time
to see what they're doing.




On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:28 AM, someword <derek.olsen@jivesoftware.com>wrote:

> Blarhg!  My prior post was out of order.
>
> Thanks!
> The updated test runs to completion
>
> I do see this which happened last time to (just this one occurrence during
> the test run)
>
> making progress 0
> You had an issue sending back messages!
> making progress 1
>
> The test run summary looks clean though
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 55.081 sec
>
> At this point is it fair to say that the symptoms we are seeing are not
> related to activemq blocking the producer but one or all of the ruby stomp
> gem, ssl and or ruby itself?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Did-I-turn-off-producer-flow-control-correctly-tp4671619p4671919.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message