Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rajdavies@gmail.com designates
 74.125.83.44 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: JMS message group + selectors
From: Robert Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1376336653846-4670296.post@n4.nabble.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:46:08 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D4776B56-9CA9-4BFB-B157-FFFEE5BEE0A4@gmail.com>
References: <1376336653846-4670296.post@n4.nabble.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org

I presume you mean message groups ? That's going to be a good thing to =
do if it is.

On 12 Aug 2013, at 20:44, salemi <alireza.salemi@udo.edu> wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
> I am planing to use JMS message group in conjunction for selector. Has
> anybody done it before?
>=20
> If I use both does it have performance implications of the JMS broker?
>=20
> Thanks
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --
> View this message in context: =
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-message-group-selectors-tp467029=
6.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.