Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of christian.posta@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1376980413473-4670502.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1376980413473-4670502.post@n4.nabble.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 05:43:56 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAKS7T5OXnqhY7psM-SgdPLS2Zk5mPnLL+P+x=_6ZkurP8RWgKg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Can I improve throughput by adding connection number to Activemq
 provider?
From: Christian Posta <christian.posta@gmail.com>
To: "users@activemq.apache.org" <users@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3c704fa356e04e4606858

--001a11c3c704fa356e04e4606858
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Sure. What kind of throughput are you trying to achieve? What are you
getting with one connection so far? Do you think you're saturating the
network connection, or could you get more through the one connection as it
is?


On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:33 PM, smith_jor <acceptany@gmail.com> wrote:

> suppose that application A send message to ActiveMQ B which has a queue
> named
> "testqueue".
>
> Can this method improve thoughtput ?
>
> application A create more than one connections to provider, then A send
> messages to the same queue (such "testqueue") using all these connections.
>
> Can this method works? or maybe using more than one connections in one
> client is not encouraged?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Can-I-improve-throughput-by-adding-connection-number-to-Activemq-provider-tp4670502.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta

--001a11c3c704fa356e04e4606858--