Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9719C10962 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 09:12:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82397 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2013 09:12:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 82313 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2013 09:12:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 82304 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2013 09:12:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 09:12:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of raul@evosent.com designates 209.85.220.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.53] (HELO mail-pa0-f53.google.com) (209.85.220.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 09:12:16 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id tj12so4221916pac.26 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 02:11:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=+P0mP9tlaaKMT74pfGCctnGGcHPl922u9WtmkBDqoC4=; b=SyDUvvv2mf5AwyYHmDx8Jh4sKSZ5KdL5nbvb5IFBQLfL3AjDDHzyTkbIzmVRB63LtN qqVBdwAyQ8Papud1fIQuEPJe5ZY7qfW5oGQkJRI1PkxVnfycl/hOVZzvKA7qIPoTHY/E gz7cbUhEAFVG7ZGat1qrmJVd45EQe3psGGU1jO+i4uKOk34tTL6OpEovvUm37sawPv1Y r1/px3wmQ8qa+YIVGV78O3a55PWUuhkLz0L3CEBryY6EJr8n+8oepvK8ClBg8aWCcGzy or/y9q7/daQGNO74IVTUgr0ZZYfri+EJRLQ2LlYXjo7M29ScIbCfnXpsX6dJ/enYOJ1x 4XwA== X-Received: by 10.68.190.104 with SMTP id gp8mr15909150pbc.120.1374225115420; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 02:11:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.70.1.193 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 02:11:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [213.143.50.5] In-Reply-To: <1374040522565-4669404.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1374040522565-4669404.post@n4.nabble.com> From: Raul Kripalani Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:11:35 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Best Protocol For ActiveMQ To: "users@activemq.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1c09cd8a71104e1d9b7a0 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmGmafDciT3B9jVMTyYgvyJaQUdE/W5p2fY7bwISwrhX4GEfaW85NsUEw92BZDCfLYvQ1FY X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8ff1c09cd8a71104e1d9b7a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The most widely used protocol (and most mature one) is definitely OpenWire over the TCP transport. Discovery tends to be very customer-specific, depending on what your IT infrastructure department accepts, e.g. multicast may be disabled on your network, in which case you could use Fabric or LDAP, or even go so far as to build a custom discoverer over HTTP or another protocol. If you place a firewall in the middle, make sure that it can handle long-running connections or you'll start seeing weird Connection Reset exceptions. P.S.: You should post user questions only on users@. I see you have posted this question 3 times in the last days. People don't like that and we may be discouraged to assist due to the bad net-etiquette. Just some advice for the future ;-) Regards, *Ra=FAl Kripalani* Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source Integration specialist http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:55 AM, turkuaz07 wrote: > Which is the best protocol for activemq networks of brokers.tcp/ip, > failover, > Discovery .. > It is important for me.Cuz For ex. I have 20 brokers.10 of them on cluste= r1 > and 10 of them on cluster2. > If I put a firewall between these two cluster does it work on performance > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Best-Protocol-For-ActiveMQ-tp466940= 4.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --e89a8ff1c09cd8a71104e1d9b7a0--