Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of christian.posta@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.49 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1374680070156-4669679.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1374680070156-4669679.post@n4.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:07:07 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAKS7T5N5Ze+CL5ownFw48T+sadLNM-saAzFvN-mbOEtcikVxLw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: cursor memory usage/limit vs memory usage/limit
From: Christian Posta <christian.posta@gmail.com>
To: "users@activemq.apache.org" <users@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3cdbae8839704e259e444

--001a11c3cdbae8839704e259e444
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I have written a little about this.. maybe check out:

http://www.christianposta.com/blog/?p=273


On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Jake Choi <jw@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Using activemq-core-5.7.0 (embedded broker), I noticed that there is the
> separate memory usage/limit called "cursor memory usage/limit" which the
> per-destination memory limit (that I set via per-destination policy)
> doesn't
> account for, but shared between all queues.  For example, from the JMX
> stats, I see all queues show the same values for the "Cursor*" metrics
> while
> independent stats for "Memory*" stats: the following is the JMX stat of one
> of queues:
>
> # the following 3 are all the same between queues
> "CursorMemoryUsage": 4294967698,
> "CursorPercentUsage": 100,
> "CursorFull": true,
>
> # the following 3 are all different between queues
> "MemoryLimit" : 536870912,
> "MemoryPercentUsage" : 0,
> "MemoryUsagePortion" : 0,
>
> I confirmed that this was not just stat difference but actually the queue
> above got affected such that it's producers got blocked by hitting this
> "cursor memory limit" to which usage it hasn't contributed at all, even
> though it doesn't use any memory (MemoryPercentUsage: 0).
>
> So, here're some questions:
> 1) what's the difference between these two memory areas:
> cursor-memory-usage
> and (just) memory-usage. when/who uses which?
> 2) can I configure per-destination limit to this cursor-memory-usage as
> well?
>
> Thanks!
> Jaewoong
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/cursor-memory-usage-limit-vs-memory-usage-limit-tp4669679.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta

--001a11c3cdbae8839704e259e444--