activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Gale <paul.n.g...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ 5.7 master/salve nfs4 both active
Date Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:19:45 GMT
Shouldn't there be a Shared File Locker element defined inside your
kahaPersistenceAdapter?

See this page for examples:
http://activemq.apache.org/pluggable-storage-lockers.html


On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:29 PM, zhjt80 <tzhang@paciolan.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your quick reply, Ceposta.
>
> I tested with below scenes,
> Master and Slave are both running on centos 6.0, kernal 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64
> 1. Master and salve connect to the NFSv4 server. Master get the lock.
> 2. I stop the NFS server for a while(about 3 minutes). Make NFS server
> available again.
> 3. The master CPU usage is very high, about 80%. the Process rpciod consume
> most of CPU.
> 4. The slave are also up.
>
> I need to restart master server.
>
> I also test with only one activeMQ server with NFS unavaiable, after NFS
> resume,  the CPU usage still very high.
> What's cause this happen? Is there a work around?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-7-master-salve-nfs4-both-active-tp4669415p4669482.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message