activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Setting a Master broker in a MasterSlave configuration
Date Wed, 03 Jul 2013 15:55:57 GMT
the lease database locker may help, if you configure the slave lease
to be small relative to the master, then the master will take over
from the slave.

https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Fuse_MQ_Enterprise/7.1/html/Configuring_Broker_Persistence/files/MQLeaseDatabaseLocker.html

On 2 July 2013 23:36, hbakkum <hayden.bakkum@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have set up ActiveMQ in a JDBC MasterSlave configuration. I have a use
> case where it would be useful to mark a broker as the "Master" broker which
> would always take a lock if it was owned by a slave. Is there anyway of
> doing this or something similar, e.g. some sort of order of precedence when
> brokers compete for the lock?
>
> I would be able to achieve this perhaps by restarting the slaves when the
> "Master" is available but does not hold the lock, however it would be much
> cleaner if I could just configure a master broker which always takes the
> lock.
>
> Any help would be most appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Hayden.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Setting-a-Master-broker-in-a-MasterSlave-configuration-tp4668815.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com

Mime
View raw message