activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
Subject Re: HTTP transport
Date Wed, 24 Jul 2013 21:33:42 GMT
Hi,

there's a difference between Camel http component and ActiveMQ http
transport. Both are solid for what they've been designed to do.

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/


On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:18 AM, moodboom <moodboom@gmail.com> wrote:

> Jason did you arrive at a compact way to include http support?
>
> Sorry to revive this old thread, but it seems relevant to my problem.  I'm
> new to this, using a pretty vanilla ActiveMQ config with a camel route, and
> getting "No component found with scheme: http4".
>
> So I'm wondering what the minimal is I have to do to enable http route
> targets.  Apologies, it might be a basic question but I'm very new to this,
> appreciate any help.
>
> Jason Dillon wrote
> > If there are folks using this in production, then why isn't this feature
> > in its own module and not lumped together with all the other fluff in
> > activemq-optional?
> >
> > I have ~12 dependency excludes when depending on that module to keep out
> > unwanted/unused stuff which is needed by other "optional" features
> > provided by that module.
> >
> > :-(
> >
> > --jason
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/HTTP-transport-tp4014555p4669671.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message