activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From hbakkum <hayden.bak...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Setting a Master broker in a MasterSlave configuration
Date Thu, 04 Jul 2013 16:51:12 GMT
Thanks for this. I've managed to configure the database lease locker such
that the master will reclaim the lock if it is held by a slave. However,
I've encountered another issue while testing failover scenarios, that is, if
a slave yields the lock due to the master starting then the slave broker
shuts down. What's odd here is that while the broker shuts down the java
process is still running. In this situation I would have expected (well, at
least preferred :P) the slave to yield the lock, stop its transport
connectors and then continue its polling task to obtain the lock in the
event of another master failure.

I've taken a look at the /Locker/ interface, in particular the /keepAlive()/
method. The javadoc states that if this method returns false, then the
broker will indeed terminate, so unfortunately, it looks like a custom
/Locker/ implementation won't help me here either.

Is there something I'm missing or any way of changing the broker behaviour
when the lock is lost?

Thanks,
Hayden.



--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Setting-a-Master-broker-in-a-MasterSlave-configuration-tp4668815p4668884.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message