Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB70210773 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 14:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46239 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2013 14:41:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 46194 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2013 14:41:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 46185 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2013 14:41:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 14:41:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of christian.posta@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.177] (HELO mail-lb0-f177.google.com) (209.85.217.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 14:41:28 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 10so338408lbf.36 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:41:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=9Ylkf/+XBjTmg43rAb7VutJ4e9wlEi2WkjM5kEzUALI=; b=DZVAmIdbJ2gIRVqunYqgNeeaer9gXJyhH7V1YXDzHk+t+ZjeW8FaxDeYEytM/NJsuY 2YoHW4WgzpIIlS0cdNMsw44jEYzzbwue4ad8i0LtPgX7nN+TbbeFBKLjYtHwWLnUvsmx ZGS6qcVxRgvBqWmT7UYGb8g4rz7qLiz1Z9tKOcWZooFEXxMJtlg/PKK60Iv3KmYbpJgX Myby/n3cGXIJUMTtjsRcBtcnp8tnr+wSJ0qaa/3Q0I+/8NArFaoBZofUjIOsmL+c3ePB 57XJphoeE7cQPTyd5UxaC3xtR8jiZa2xW8TK30QbF5WUaFT7k2g3SQe9NcDP/4vDkIcN IdOg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.9.69 with SMTP id x5mr4976697laa.57.1370356866459; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.98.35 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 07:41:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1370355160573-4667798.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1370355160573-4667798.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 07:41:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to achieve ActiveMQ Load balanching From: Christian Posta To: "users@activemq.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158b4de3daf4a04de551248 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0158b4de3daf4a04de551248 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yes, use network of brokers with dynamic failover which achieves what you're looking to do. See the "Broker side Options for failover" in the wiki. You could also take a look at Fuse Fabric which provides similar functionality using zookeeper. http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html http://fuse.fusesource.org/fabric/ On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Mohammed Aslam wrote: > How to implement Loadbalancing in active MQ. I saw a few articles on > failover, network of brokers etc. > But that doesnt server my purpose. > By load balancer, I am looking for a solution like, for web application we > use apache proxy infront of multiple application server to balance the load > and client will get only one url of the proxy not the actual url of the > server. > > In active MQ is ther anyway we can achieve same kind of loadbalanching so > that the client will connect to only one url, there may be multiple brokers > running but the client need not worry about those things. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-achieve-ActiveMQ-Load-balanching-tp4667798.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta --089e0158b4de3daf4a04de551248--